That...is a horse.
Horses don't have three eyes, a horn, cloven hooves, or scaley arms and legs. At least not where I'm from.
Anyway, the scaley arms and legs qualify her for the scaley thread, and I don't see you posting anything better.
Dragons don't have hooves, a unicorn horn or a thin tail.
It doesn't belong here. just adding a couple fish scales doesn't qualify. Anon is right.
I think it may be a good idea if someone added a mythological beast page. beasts of lore like a kirin don't really fit in any of the standing boards.... That or a monster board.
er. I mean not a new board. like a new thread.
Whos the artist? And from what website?
Found on e621
Edited with HDR, noise removal, color correction, and 2x Resolution in CS6 as are all my posts.
wow, you managed to take a beautifully compressed 96KB jpg and turn it into a blurry neon 2.5MB disaster
wonderful post processing, real good work
Get a Frisbee from the store or friend.
Clean the Frisbee.
Make sure your parents aren't around
Put something slippery on it, like butter or cream.>Get really super pissed.
Fold the Frisbee hard (this is crucial)
Keep folded and insert Frisbee into mouth hard.
Push hard until you can't see it.
You can keep your shitty JPEG scanned watermarked faded images. There's nothing blurry about it unless your monitor is low res or can't display the full range of an HDR pic.
I don't care about file size when it comes to quality, the more the better. I believe in maximizing the potential of an image within the limitations given. Those limitations just happen to be 3MB for this site, 16 bit PNG, or 8 bit if I have to use JPEG, and the original quality, shading, and color range of the image. I only remove noise while preserving detail using Imagenomic Noiseware Professional, and I upres images using Alien Skin Blow Up. HDR brings out the maximum color range in any image, putting darks and lights at their true level and toning the image accordingly.
This is not a post processing effect. You lose more important detail saving anything as a JPEG. I can always give the source to the images I post.
faded? thats the natural result the artist intended, you're just slapping a bunch of goofy filters to jack up the contrast, stretching it out and blurring it to cover the artifacts from stretching it. you might not care about inflating the file by orders of magnitude on your hard disk but you're costing the host of this site an arm and a leg in bandwidth with that nonsense
>You lose more important detail saving anything as a JPEG.
uh, you've posted nothing but jpegs dude. lol
hey you're getting better, that one's only 10000% a waste of space instead of 20000%
I'm not getting into a tech vs art argument with you, the internet is almost at 3.0 now and I think we deserve better quality when TB drives are becoming standard and Gigabit internet is coming around the corner. It's the site host decision as to what limits they want to impose and what to remove, just as it's your choice as to what equipment you own, and how you porn.
of course not, there's no argument. and that's the joke, you think adding file size adds quality and that's really funny. i couldn't help but point it out when i noticed this thread
the data was already removed you can't get it back. besides jpeg removes data that doesn't really change how things look. that's the whole point. used correctly the drop in quality is negligible, in that one example the 96kb one looks great.
even then you can't restore what was lost. the biggest apparent effect is the drastic difference in contrast from the hdr. so other than distorting the artists' choice in color you're adding back a bunch of junk data and doing another round of lossy compression, further distorting the image from the original, then you're saving it in a giant file and making barty pay to sit on it and send it all over the world
saying that a hdr filter sets all the colors to their 'true' level is pretty amazing too
lmao a perfectionist, that's perfect. of course you are
i didn't ever tell you to do or not do anything, just pointed out how dumb it is. you're as bad at reading as you are at image formats
reporting my posts will not make them any less true. also its kind of not a great idea when i'm the guy that deletes reported posts
Gigabit internet? what country are you in again? Last i check only Korea and Japan get that primo shit for cheap.
Last I heard, a number of Scandinavian and other European countries do as well.
Check the news once in a while, not only has Google brought Gigabit internet to a few US cities for relatively cheap, $70 per month, but even the FCC wants to bring gigabit to the entire country within 2-3 years. It is literally right around the corner as I said. Change may be slow, but technology seems to have a different curve altogether.
wow thanks for finding these they're great :3
it says "you are not allowed to view this image"
You have to log in to see adult pics on FA
How did you get it so huge, yet so sharp?
Why is the original not this size? Also what else did you edit?
Thanks for doing it!
I photoshoped it using third party filters Alien skin blow up to upres the file without reducing clarity, imagenomic noiseware to remove any visible noise, and corrected the color using the standard filters auto color, auto tone, white balance, and then HDR toning to correct the colors to perceptually realistic level, and edited the document in 16bit color.
>>34104>not the original artist of an image>makes the colours different from the colours of the raw image>"correcting the colours"
I'm so glad I know guys pixiv so I can just get his stuff in its raw form.
Jesus god in heaven that is fucking awful. Please stop posting this amateur shit.
ek goya.. crayon prince of vcl
I know you don't see dick but this is a herm
, come on now,this goes there not here.
dick seen or not
that's a herm come on now.